When Homer Bailey made his Major League debut, the power
went out in my house in the third or fourth inning. In a move that bordered on
desperation, I grabbed a transistor radio that I had for emergencies and turned
the dial to 700 as we once did back in Ohio. Sure, it was a longshot, but WLW
had one of the strongest radio signals in the country. It turned out to be a
good night for the signal, as Marty’s voice broke through the static and I listened
to the Reds on radio all the way in Washington, DC.
Chris has a transistor radio that he listens to
constantly. While the rest of us living in the 21st century rely on
devices we still call phones, he carries around this ode to nostalgia, the
incessant drone of sports talk radio crackling from its antiquated speakers.
Yet there’s something whimsically romantic about it, about that crackle, a sort
of symphony of radiowaves that reminds us of the past while transmitting
realtime events. It’s not like Instagram, with its faux retro scheme, but a
genuine artifact of simpler times in the realm of media.
The temperature was wonderfully warm a couple of nights
ago; as soon as I arrived home from work I ventured out to our garden to redo
part of the rock border, as rain had covered some of the rocks with dirt and
birds had displaced others (as well as knocking off marigold blossoms!) While
our internet signal reaches to the garden and I have watched a couple of Reds
games out there, I was rather enjoying the peace of the evening devoid of
screens and technology and chose to leave the laptop inside and savor the
tranquility in being among the plants and nature. Soon, Chris came home with
his transistor radio, and we listened to the Nationals-Orioles game while
drinking summer beers and playing with rocks. We passed a simple, happy moment
fringed with nostalgia, the good kind of nostalgia, full of the pleasure of
happy memories and warmth, firmly rooted in realtime.
Unfortunately, much of the psychological research on
nostalgia is located behind the paywalls of scholarly journals I cannot afford,
and much of that has been limited to the field of consumer psychology, that
field that researches ways to fool you into buying something you don’t need
while appealing to your sense of nostalgia. However, my personal Google machine
tells me that until recently, nostalgia was associated with an unhealthy
emotional state. Indeed, the term itself is derived from the Greek words for “return”
and “suffering.” Recent research suggests nostalgia can be a healthy emotion
that eases loneliness, helps people get through difficult periods in their
lives, and gives them a sense of stability through changing times. Feeling nostalgic
is a way to maintain one’s sense of identity.
Of course, these are only psychological studies. The human
brain is a vastly mysterious entity about which we know little, and empirical
neurological research on nostalgia is scarce. I found this rather interesting
article “Nostalgia: the similarities between immunological and neurologicalmemory” by Lawrence Steinman of Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine at
Stanford in which he discusses the importance of memory in both the immune
system and the nervous system. I particularly like Steinman’s reference to
Proust’s “Remembrance of Things Past,”
from which he quotes “Remembrance of
things past is not necessarily the remembrance of things as they were.” He
talks briefly about how neurological memory shapes our personalities and goes
on to discuss what our neurological and immune memories have in common. The
article raises curiosity in my mind about nostalgia’s links to identity and the
failure to recognize self as does one who is afflicted with prosopagnosia, a neurological
phenomenon that shares features with autoimmune diseases when there is a
failure of recognition of self. I’m not a neurologist or a psychologist, so I
can only naively speculate and puzzle over the marvels and possibilities of the
brain. I wonder if diseases such as Alzheimer’s actually make nostalgia come to
life, and if that is the case, can’t too much nostalgia among seemingly healthy
people be unhealthy? Isn’t dwelling on the past detrimental to a sound mental
state?
Proust also wrote, “When
from the distant past nothing remains, after the beings have died, after the
things are destroyed and scattered, still, alone, more fragile, yet more vital,
more insubstantial, more persistent, more faithful, the smell and taste of
things remain poised a long time, like souls, ready to remind us, waiting and
hoping for their moment, amid the ruins of everything else; and bear
unfaltering, in the tiny and almost impalpable drop of their essence, the
immense architecture of memory.”
The smell and taste
of things. Smells bring back emotional memories better than the other
senses because the olfactory bulb is part of the emotional center of the brain
and has strong input into the amygdala, where emotions are processed. The
sensory cues around us are also integral to how our brains map our movement
through space. We have neurons called “place cells” that help us find our way
in the world. While reading this article on The Atlantic Cities about how
understanding our brain’s mapping capabilities can help us to better design
city spaces, I began to wonder how our brains, whose place cell neurons have
each learned how to care for one particular place, deal with the loss of those
places, like when a ballpark is imploded out of existence.
These place cells are located within the brain’s
hippocampus, which has its own memory system with unique characteristic
functions. However, when it comes to emotional situations, the hippocampus
interacts with the amygdala and acts in concert when memory and emotion meet.
Knowing this, I couldn’t help but wonder if those neurons play any part in
developing emotional attachments and if the destruction of places that have
become a part of our identities (after
the things are destroyed and scattered), like Riverfront Stadium was a part
of mine (is, perhaps), has a disconcerting or detrimental effect on our brains.
If a place like Riverfront Stadium, a place that was so important in my
childhood, no longer exists, what happens to that neuron whose sole job was to
know Riverfront Stadium? And why do I feel a longing to go to a baseball game
there but I have no deep emotional connection to Riverfront’s replacement
ballpark?
Marty Brennaman’s voice was not coming out of that
transistor radio the other night, but the crackle of baseball was. It certainly
fired up the part of my brain that produces nostalgia. Remembrance of things
past and which can never be again. I suppose that’s simply a part of baseball.
A part of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment